Priscilla Presley Slams ‘Shameful’ Lawsuit Claims That She Ignored Lisa Marie’s Health Woes in Plot to Control Elvis Estate

Priscilla Presley has fiercely rejected a recent Lawsuit that accuses her of ignoring Lisa Marie’s health struggles as part of a scheme to seize control of Elvis’s estate. In a forceful response, Priscilla called the legal action “shameful” and defended her record caring for her daughter. The lawsuit—filed by former business partners—raises sensational allegations that Priscilla and others exploited Lisa Marie’s condition to gain influence, claims Priscilla says are baseless and malicious.

What the Lawsuit Alleges

The Lawsuit alleges that, in the months before Lisa Marie’s death, certain decisions were made that prioritized control of the estate over her well-being. According to the complaint, plaintiffs who identify as former business partners claim they witnessed actions that supposedly sidelined medical input and ignored Lisa Marie’s health needs. Those claims suggest a concerted effort by unnamed parties to consolidate power over Elvis’s assets.

Priscilla’s team disputes that narrative. They characterize the lawsuit as a reckless attempt at malicious character assassination, accusing the plaintiffs of spinning salacious stories for financial gain and public attention.

Priscilla’s Response: ‘Shameful’ and Unfounded

In a statement, Priscilla called the lawsuit “shameful,” saying the filing traffics in innuendo rather than fact. She denied any suggestion she ignored Lisa Marie’s care or sought to control the estate through deceptive means. Priscilla stressed that decisions around Lisa Marie’s care were complex, involved medical professionals, and were guided by the daughter’s prior wishes.

The filing prompted defenders of Priscilla to call out the timing and tone of the lawsuit, arguing the claims are an unfair attack on a family navigating grief. Critics of the complaint have labeled it an example of accusing a grieving relative in order to extract publicity and money.

Who Brought the Case?

Named in the Lawsuit are two people described as former business partners, who argue they were wronged by maneuvers tied to Elvis’s legacy. The complaint references interactions with people close to the family and asserts the plaintiffs suffered financially and reputationally. The case names individuals identified in coverage as Kruse and Kevin; plaintiffs say their allegations stem from firsthand experience with estate-related decisions.

Priscilla’s legal team responded by promising to vigorously defend against what they describe as “completely unfounded” claims, and to pursue dismissal if necessary. They also emphasized that any suggestion of deliberate misconduct in the handling of Lisa Marie’s health is false.

The Broader Stakes: Control, Grief, and Public Scrutiny

The lawsuit touches bigger issues. Who controls a famous legacy? How do families handle illness in public? What are the ethics of suing a grieving family? For Priscilla, the complaint is more than legal. It is a reputational threat. She says it aims to control the story and profit from pain.

Observers say high-profile suits mix real legal questions with sensational claims. That blend confuses the public. It becomes hard to tell facts from rumor. The problem is worse when famous people are involved.

结论

Priscilla Presley has strongly slammed the lawsuit. She called the claims that she ignored Lisa Marie’s health “shameful.” She denies any plot to take control of Elvis’s estate. The dispute now moves into the courts. Judges will weigh the plaintiffs’ claims — made by former business partners — against Priscilla’s denials. For the family, the case raises painful questions about grief, privacy, and the cost of defending a legacy in public.